The unfolding political drama within the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Bauchi State has taken a troubling turn, with former governor Isa Yuguda resorting to sweeping allegations against the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Tuggar. However, beyond the noise, a more critical question emerges: are these claims rooted in verifiable facts, or are they part of a calculated political strategy to weaken a perceived rival?
A careful examination of the accusations reveals a pattern that is all too familiar in Nigeria’s political landscape serious claims made without publicly available evidence. Allegations of bribery, internal sabotage, and deliberate destabilisation of the party are weighty issues that demand proof, not press statements. In the absence of such evidence, they risk being viewed as politically motivated narratives aimed at discrediting Tuggar’s rising profile within the APC.
It is also important to note that Yusuf Tuggar is not a newcomer in Nigeria’s political landscape. Before his current role as Minister of Foreign Affairs, he served as a member of the Nigerian House of Representatives, representing Gamawa Federal Constituency in Bauchi State. During his time in the National Assembly, Tuggar was known for his contributions to legislative debates, policy advocacy, and constituency development, earning a reputation as a focused and articulate lawmaker.
Beyond his legislative career, Tuggar has remained an active and influential figure within the APC, playing strategic roles in party mobilisation and national politics. He was among key figures who contributed to the political momentum that led to the electoral success of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, particularly through engagement, coordination, and support structures that strengthened the party’s performance in critical areas. His political experience and network therefore reflect years of active involvement, not a sudden emergence on the scene.
Yusuf Tuggar, by virtue of his position as Nigeria’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, occupies a role that requires global engagement, strategic diplomacy, and national representation. It stretches logic to suggest that a serving minister, burdened with international responsibilities, would abandon his mandate to orchestrate internal party crises at the state level. Such claims not only undermine his office but also diminish the seriousness of political discourse.
What appears more plausible is that the growing influence and political relevance of Tuggar in Bauchi State may be unsettling certain entrenched interests. History has shown that in moments like this, accusations often become tools of political survival deployed not necessarily to inform the public, but to shape perception and control narratives ahead of future contests.
Even more concerning is the attempt to frame political ambition as a crime. In a democratic system, aspiring to leadership is both legitimate and expected. The real issue is not ambition, but the desperation to suppress it through unverified allegations and public smear campaigns.
If indeed there are credible concerns about misconduct, the appropriate avenue remains clear: present evidence before relevant party organs or law enforcement agencies. Resorting to media battles without substantiation only deepens division and weakens public trust in political leadership.
At a time when the APC in Bauchi State should be consolidating its structure ahead of future elections, the focus appears to have shifted toward internal warfare. This is not only counterproductive but risks handing political advantage to opposition forces who are closely watching the cracks within the ruling party.
Tuggar, on his part, has largely remained focused on his national assignment, avoiding unnecessary engagement in local political disputes. That restraint, in itself, reflects a level of maturity that should be encouraged, not attacked.
Ultimately, the APC in Bauchi must decide whether it wants to be defined by progress or by internal sabotage disguised as whistleblowing. Political disagreements are inevitable, but weaponising unproven allegations is a dangerous path that could erode the party from within.
In the end, leadership is not measured by the volume of accusations one can make, but by the ability to unite, build, and move forward. If the party is to remain relevant and competitive, it must rise above personal battles and refocus on collective purpose.
Until then, Nigerians will continue to ask: who truly benefits from this growing storm within the APC in Bauchi?
Beyond the present accusations, it is also important to revisit documented concerns that trailed Isa Yuguda’s tenure as governor of Bauchi State. Public records and media reports over the years have repeatedly linked his administration to investigations by anti-corruption agencies, raising questions that remain part of Nigeria’s political memory.
In one widely reported case, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) seal off a high-value property linked to Isah Yuguda in Bauchi. The action, according to the commission, was part of an ongoing investigation into allegations bordering on abuse of office, money laundering, and diversion of public funds.
Further reports also indicated that the EFCC had at various times investigated properties and financial dealings connected to the former governor. These investigations, covered by reputable media organisations, contributed to a narrative that placed his tenure under significant public and institutional examination.
Similarly, findings from a high-powered committee set up by a succeeding administration in Bauchi reportedly uncovered widespread irregularities in contracts awarded between 2007 and 2015. The committee alleged that billions of naira could not be properly accounted for, recommending recovery from contractors, officials, and financial institutions linked to those transactions.
While it is important to stress that allegations do not equate to guilt, they nevertheless form part of the public record. In this context, it becomes even more necessary for political actors to exercise restraint when making unverified claims against others.
In light of these lingering concerns, it becomes imperative for Isa Yuguda to clearly state his position regarding the past allegations linked to his tenure. Public accountability demands that individuals who once held high office should not shy away from addressing issues that remain part of public discourse. Silence or deflection only fuels further speculation. More importantly, it raises questions about the moral standing from which such an individual chooses to level serious accusations against others, particularly figures like Yusuf Tuggar, whose public record continues to be defined by active national service and diplomatic responsibility.
Indeed, many observers argue that a political figure with a history of repeated scrutiny should exercise greater restraint in public commentary. Engaging in loud and unsubstantiated accusations against others, while unresolved questions from one’s own past remain, risks appearing less like accountability and more like political distraction. In such circumstances, credibility becomes a central issue one that cannot be separated from history, public perception, and institutional records.
Given the challenges facing Isa Yuguda, there is a need for him to provide the public with clear answers to key questions regarding the corruption allegations during his administration. Below are some of these questions:
1. What is your clear position on the corruption-related investigations and allegations that trailed your tenure as governor of Bauchi State?
2. Can you publicly clarify the outcome of the EFCC-related cases and reports concerning properties and financial dealings linked to you?
3. How do you respond to findings from review committees that alleged financial irregularities during your administration?
4. What tangible legacy or compendium of achievements can you present to Bauchi people from your time in office?
5. In light of your record, on what moral grounds do you make strong allegations against other public officials?
Given the weight of these unresolved questions, some observers argue that it may be more appropriate for Isa Yuguda to first address concerns surrounding his own record, rather than publicly associating himself with a party like the APC that positions itself on integrity, accountability, and progressive governance.
In recent weeks, concerns have continued to mount over the alleged role of son of Isah Yuguda, Muslim Isah Yuguda, Special Adviser (SA) within the APC Bauchi Structure and Coordinator of the Renewed Hope Agenda in Bauchi State in the internal tensions within the APC in Bauchi State. Political observers claim that his growing involvement in party activities has been marked by actions and rhetoric perceived to deepen divisions rather than promote cohesion. While these claims remain matters of public discussion, they have nonetheless contributed to an atmosphere of uncertainty within the party’s structure at the state level.
Analysts argue that for any emerging political figure, especially one linked to an established political family, the expectation should be to build bridges and strengthen party unity. However, the allegations surrounding Muslim Yuguda suggest a different trajectory one that raises questions about intent, experience, and the broader implications for APC’s stability in Bauchi. As the party navigates a sensitive period, there are increasing calls for all actors, regardless of status or background, to adopt a more responsible and unifying approach to political engagement.
