Dateline Uyo: A political theatre to watch


Following our earlier article, ”From Saraki to Akpabio: And the mighty go for a political freefall”, a reader who identified himself simply as Usom called. He asked, ”why is the Federal government desperate to win Akwa Ibom by all means foul than fair? My brother, must the APC manufacture victory against the peoples will? Why are they so desperate they need the security agencies, not excluding the soldiers, but not voters, not the Akwa Ibom peoples, to win? Are there things they are not telling us?”

So, the question is: Why is Akwa Ibom being turned into a martial stage for the purposes of state elections? Many have speculated that the APC government is actually a two-region internal colonialist coalition against the rest of Nigeria. See

Thus the APC, while being regional and internal colonialist, wants to wear a mask of nationalism, of being nationalists. There is also the fact that the South-South is the wealth basket of the nation. And those who are at their game of regional-tribal internal colonializations, want the South-South, and specifically Akwa Ibom, as the liquidity providers. That is for their planned internal imperialism of the rest of the Nigerian people, including Akwa Ibom peoples, the Akwa Ibomites and the South-South will be the sources of the funding.

In other words, the Akwa Ibom peoples are to bleed out the very resources upon which they will be made a tributary region, upon which they will be made second class citizens. And expectedly there are no lack of local Quislings and comprador collaborators, including an infamous outgoing common senator.

As in all evil schemes, one desperation leads to another. Lately, besides the militarization and securitization of Akwa Ibom specifically, and the South-South generally, attempts are on top gear to compromise and capture the Independent Electoral Commission, INEC as a tool of APC in the South-South, etc. In other words for the Abuja powers and local collaborators, INEC has to exist only as stool pigeons to help post and fix manufactured results in Akwa Ibom, etc.

A reputable newspaper has scooped on the news: ”The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) may redeploy the Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) in Akwa Ibom State, Mike Igini, before the forthcoming governorship and House of Assembly elections across the country, top sources in the commission have told PREMIUM TIMES.

An official in the commission told PREMIUM TIMES on Monday afternoon that the chairman of INEC, Mahmood Yakubu, has been under pressure from the federal government to redeploy Mr Igini from Akwa Ibom.”

In all there is need for a serious warning. Nigeria is not a banana republic. Any attempts to abridge or breach the expression of the voters preferences will be met by the iron will of the people. This is the 21st century. 

Already, an outgoing senator has wagered that he is the God’s will of Akwa Ibom politics. And he added to his god delusion, the immense and immeasurable powers of the Federal Government. Yet, the people floored him, the voters gave him a technical knockout. The choice of the people is to go on with Udom Emmanuel and help turn Akwa Ibom into Africa’s leading centre of excellence. The choice of the people is not to be distracted by an Abuja, by an APC, that has not done anything and has no plans for Akwa Ibomites specifically, and the South-South peoples generally.

Rather than cut deals, Atiku should go to court

The rule of law is not a requirement of the law. It cannot be. If it were, it is thus self-referential. And nothing self-referential has logic on any of its sides. And as lawyers say, you can’t stand something on nothing. Self-reference is nothingness in logic.

Additionally, truth never stood on self-reference or even self-reverence, even if divine. Truth must be collaborated by facts or existences, outside itself. Not understanding this is the problem of the religions and their scriptures, even if they refuse to admit to it. Religions are too self-reverential to be worth a puff in logic. Fortuitously however, there is faith and there is belief and there is delusion. So religions prosper on those. Anyway, this is by the way.

The rule of law is a requirement of society. Or more properly, the philosophers who constructed and are constructors of such societies. Before we go further, it is important to restate that it is axial philosophers, herein referred to as Buddha, who are the architects of functional and sustainable societies. It is Buddha, not Caesar. The fact of this is important. This is because the bane of Nigerian development is in our not coming to knowledge of this fact.

Now, it is these constructors of [Western and lately Asian] society, who indicate that in the event disagreements over commonly contested issues, citizens should not self-adjudicate. They must go to a specialized body of citizens – judges – for resolution of their doubts, one way or the other. So the rite of going to court is barely judicial. It is actually societal or if you liked civilizational. Thus it is an act of incivility, perhaps anarchism, to want to foreclose on citizens availing themselves of sustainable societies’ processes. That which is legal is of society. Legality is not self-existent.

The point is that Alhaji Abubarka Atiku, rightly or deluded, feels he has been grievously robbed of his legitimate victory at the polls. It thus can be said that Atiku has the following options. First, he could go on the streets and prompt the monkeys and baboons to soak in human blood. Two, he could trigger a coup to recoup his allegedly stolen presidential mandate. Third, he could go to court and submit himself to the superior opinions of the wise men and women who preside there. Interestingly and this is important, Atiku by going to court has submitted himself to the rule of law, whatever the outcome. And the rule of law presumes that neither of the litigants, here an Atiku or a President Muhammadu Buhari, may be sure his prayers will be granted. In fact, Buhari might as well floor Atiku judicially and retain his presidential Eagle. In other words, by going to court, Atiku agrees to two precepts.

1. That by going to court he abjures the ”rites” of coups and street mayhems. That is he chooses civilization above self-help or the rule of the mob. We should salute him for this.

2. But by going to court Atiku agrees to and accepts his ”judicial flooring” if and when it is pronounced, up to his appellate fullness, etc. Atiku derivatively, also counts that on his triumph, it’s the duty of society to return his stolen presidency to him.

Perhaps it is important to state here that the court and judicial processes are creations, allies and instruments of the larger society, not the litigant parties. That is the courts are not there to favor one litigant against the other. They are there to prosper and advance society, not even the law, save tangentially. That is to say, that all the alleged contentions about heating up or freezing down the polity are known to the judges and the law. And they make their decisions in the light of all they know, including what the parties in issue lay before them. Thus, the very idea of the courts is to douse not inflame, prosper not disrupt, society.

How then, can persons advise Atiku should not go court, if as it is, he is aggrieved? See: and Should Atiku now do a coup? That is one.

The other, is that society itself is built on and run by institutions and systems. And of the systems, especially in the Western civilizational order, elections or competitive politics and the rule of law, are major examples.

Now, every Nigerian supports the building and strengthening of systems and institutions. And this includes a certain NBA president those who advises Atiku against going to court, alas. The larger point however is that systems and institutions are and don’t exist academically or in seminar pronouncements. That is to say, systems and institutions exist in reality, that is under quotidian stresses, or ”street” conditions. Thus institutions and systems cannot be developed or strengthened without testing them, without operationalizing them, in reality.

Please forgive us our military background – we are Colonels retired, Biafra Army. And it so happened that the latest evolution of the fearsome German tank, the Leopard, was touted as the best battle tank of all times. Suddenly came the Gulf war and the Leopards performed below par at the Arabian deserts. So it had to be recalled and redesigned, etc. Tanks by the way are systems and institutions in the war machine, German, Biafran or anywhere else.

In other words, what those who advise against an Atiku litigation, are calling for the Nigerian political and judicial systems, to remain fanciful, never tested or operated in reality. But systems and institutions are not born or strengthened that way. Systems and institutions only exist in praxis not as inviolate conceptualizations. Systems and institutions are not spread sheet, non-real life case study entities. In other words, Atiku going to court is actually in strengthening and stabilizing the democratic, judicial, systemic and institutional orders all at once. To advice otherwise is to push for coup making and barbarianism.

We are thus safer that we test and strengthen our systems and institutions, rather than repress legitimate grievances of citizens or restlessness. The danger is this. Wherever infractions and grievances are not allowed to be aired or adjudicated, history indicates as follows. That such a society will in spite of itself be undermined from below. And just like the clouds when it can no longer bear the weight of dews, a society with too much unexpressed, un-adjudicated grievances, will one day thunder out in coups and mayhems. That is the equivalent of a nation being led to hell for a matter they can resolve on earth. In other words it is safer Atiku goes to court than have Nigeria go to hell. All else is humor.

Leave a Reply